Islamic men are weak but that's ok:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=25210

Students of the Koran equals Terrorists in training:

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/10/31/asia/AS_GEN_Pakistan_Militants_Attacked.php

But they're hardworking people that just want a better life?!:

http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1514123.ece

I'm willing to fight, are you?:

http://www.aina.org/news/20061030193120.htm

Has this moron sworn allegiance to allah, or is he just the average moron?:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1161811213704&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

More Islamic feminism:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/7598_1831979,000500020000.htm

This is why Lawyers, politicians, scholars, and media people are the first ones shot after a revolution:

http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20061027-112013-6863r

Socialism and Communism are ideologies and philosophies that thrive in man's failures. A Lack of discipline, intelligence, persistence, work ethic, faith, responsibility, integrity, and humility lead to desires for someone else to provide for you. Lacking these but still desiring worldly items leads to personal chaos. "If others have it I deserve it." The American Dream no longer requires hardwork and persistence. Blame others for your own failures and then file a law suit. Then when you have blown through all that money blame it on everyone else and get a handout.

The government's job is to protect and enforce the laws in order to make it possible for the individual to build his own home and wealth through own work ethic, intelligence, and persistence. No individual has the right to another's treasure. A good individual will share in his wealth but he is not required to starve his own family in doing so. Europe is presently near the end of a suicidal path that we Americans are trying to get on. Sacrifice is honorable unless the end result it the death of others. In this case, a whole nation.

Big business is blamed for a lot of the problems in the world today. The question I have is what is big business? It's not the business that destroys people, it is the person running the business. Big business doesn't cheat, lie, and steal. It is the individuals in charge. Therefore, People destroy People. But this is the terminology that has permeated our society. We talk and blame groups as opposed to individuals. I am still waiting for someone to give me a legitimate definition of Social Justice.

All these new terms are socialistic at best and communistic at worst. It takes away responsibility, blame, and appreciation from the individual and lumps them onto group. These groups are defined by religion, color, ethnicity, ideology, and any other category you can come up with. Generalization is a natural action of the human mind, everyone does it. But relying on generalizations eliminates ones need to deal with people on an individual basis. How does a person respond in dealing with a person who doesn't match the generalization? Most people consider this an oddity and keep their generalization. At what point will a person change their generalization? Unfortunately it appears that most people won't no matter what the preponderance of evidence shows. Heaven forbid we were actually wrong.

As for religions, the ones I am semi-knowledgeable about, Judaism and Christianity require people to deal with others as individuals whereas Islam puts everyone into groups, Infidels and Muslims. Judaism and Christianity call for its believers to judge other people by their actions but to not judge their heart this is G-d's job. Islam judges solely by believer and non-believer. Socialism and Communism judge by "haves" versus "have nots." No matter the reason, the "have nots" are obviously oppressed while the "haves" are cheats. Not only is this wrong, it is irrational. But, this is part of generalization. Generalization makes life appear easier because it eliminates thought and research. Islam makes life appear easier because it eliminates thought. Judaism, Christianity, Republican Democracy, and Capitalism requires people to spend time,effort, and money in learning about others in order to grow. Socialism, Communism, and Islam are stagnant ideologies that offer no future.

The farther we go down the path trodden by Europe the less likely we are to survive. Individualism is in the process of being replaced. The Bill of Right will be unnecessary in the current path. The Individualist who built this country and fought for right and justice will be deemed heretics and pariahs. The G-d that provided the light in our darkness will be replaced by humanistic impulses. It all started when man started to place himself above G-d but beneath the animal.

But I though Islam was a religion of peace and tolerance?
 
Religious Tolerance:

http://www.aina.org/news/20061029141418.htm

Islamic Heroes:

http://euronews.net/create_html.php?page=detail_info&article=387772&lng=1

Islamic Feminism:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/women-cant-refuse-sex-with-husband-islamic-group/2006/10/28/1161749357764.html

Women's Rights:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20662999-1702,00.html

 The party that was infiltrated by communists, then cultural relativists, is now going to be infiltrated by Islamists. This is that diversity that Democrats claim to cherish. I can't necessarily call it infiltration because the Democrats are courting these people. If a party speaks with 30 different heads it is impossible to pinpoint its position on any given topic. It appears that the only issues these talking heads have to have in common is anti-Israel and anti-America. Freedom of speech only applies to those who will push pro-abortion/anti-death penalty, pro-Islam/anti-Judeo Christian, pro-communal property/anti-property rights, pro-rehab/pro drugs. The list of confusion goes on and on.

Teddy Kennedy "lets" a woman die and gets a pass. Studds has "sex" with an underage boy and he's made a hero. Jimmy Carter proves inept as a President and sets up the failure in North Korea and he's lionized. Barney Frank has a gay prostitution ring run out of his house and he's looked to as a strong willed person. The more I read of FDR the more respect I lose for him. It would appear that he was a socialist. If he wasn't he had enough people around him dictating his socialist policies. There's enough questions behind JFK to disprove any idea of Camelot that the romantics have tried to assign him.

The Democratic party disgusts me. The Republican party isn't faring much better. The voter, those who actually research and have a legitimate opinion, are forced to consolidate their oleo of beliefs into one party or the other. This is the "put the square peg in the circle hole" dilemma. This makes it impossible for a person to vote their conscience affectively. I have stated before that I am to the right of the President and left of Pat Buchanan. This leaves me with no candidate I feel comfortable voting for. I digress.

The Democratic Party has no ideas, no plans, and no soul. They are living by rhetoric and ignorance. They came up with the idea of pulling out of Iraq and now they are trying to sugarcoat it. They want to repeal the Tax cuts but they claim they don't want to raise taxes. If the Democrats take control, taxes will be added to just about everything. Don't be surprised if they try to put forward a "global warming" tax like Great Britain is attempting. The Democrats think they have a right to the money we earn. They want to punish the "doers" in order to benefit the failures. They want to go back to talking to despots. They want alternative fuels as long as it doesn't start in their backyard. They are a pathetic bunch of losers.

The Republican candidates might not be "worthy" of votes, but the alternative is immediately disastrous. This is another election of the lesser of two evils. Truthfully, I'm getting tired of it. Can I please have a candidate that has the morals and ethics to stand by the truth?!

 We are presently experiencing a snowstorm here in the Springs. My whole family gets to enjoy a snowday at home. I have a stew cooking and the kids are all wrapped in blankets watching "the Muppets." My computer has been hiccupping and creating problems because we are taking power hits. This will be it for me today. I have posted a few comments and they took a while to complete.

Today is a good day to read. I posted a comment on unpureason recommending the book 'Witness" by Whitaker Chambers. If you want to know where and when the Dems went awry, you will find it here.

James

Recently I have been writing about the idealist approach and its failure that the President used when entering Iraq. I support the war effort and I do believe that war with Iraq was necesssary. The removal of Saddam was and is an improvement. The problem with the President's approach was that he applied western thinking to the arab-islamic world. The last war American troops were allowed to truly fight in was Korea and that was given the brakes before it was finished. Vietnam was being run by politicians in the beltway as opposed to the men in the field. Despite that, the military did succeed at the missions the were given. Unfortunately they were prohibited from defeating the enemy. The weak will of the "free love" generation was put on display and manipulated to the enemy's advantage. The Vietnamese hid in their holes making hit and run assaults and waited for the Americans to leave. The Islamic world has learned much about Americans from this tactic. America has not lost a war when American's displayed an unbreakable will. That unbreakable will appears to be dying as the "Greatest Generation" dies.

The war in Iraq was an invasion that forced the enemy to run and hide. The Iraqi army knew it couldn't defeat American military might so it allied itself with terror organizations. They are now waiting for the American people to quit. In order to truly win a war the enemy must lose all hope of success and fear annihilation. Instead, it is the American people that are losing the hope of success and are actually afraid to unleash true military might because of the "innocents" that would be killed. Pundits and talking heads are coming out of the woodworks to point fingers and claim that we are nothing more than imperialists. According to them it is America that is the problem in the world.

If we were truly imperialist we would have wiped out Iraq, taken over the government, and enforced our laws on these people. The Presidents idealism stopped this from happening. This is what I think we should have done. The only way to build a better country and culture is to destroy the existing evil one. Nothing that Iraq had in place was of value in the modern world. The laws they had were varying and archaic. Tribes and militias were constantly at battle and waited for the moment they could bring it to the fore. To participate in war means to kill the enemy. This means death to anyone siding with the enemy. Islamic faith is used to foster the hatred that we face now. The infidels entered their holy land and it needs to be cleansed. It doesn't matter to these people that the infidel rid them of an evil man they couldn't depose themselves. It doesn't matter that the infidel is spending its treasure to provide infrastructure and services to the locals. It doesn't matter to these people that the infidel has sacrificed its citizens in the defense of Iraqi freedom. This translates easily, these people don't think like us.

I have no problem with the President changing strategy. I do have a problem if it will be more of the white glove treatment. We allowed the Afghans to keep sharia law as the contolling component in their government. BIG MISTAKE. This provides more of the same. This is provides inherent bigotry within the government. Allowing Al Sadr to have a political party has not eliminated his attacks within Iraq. This attempt at diplomacy was a bad idea. Al Sadr should be dead along with his followers and other Iranian lackeys.

Had I had the keys to this car one of the first trips I would have made are to the mosques. every single one of them would have been flattened. Troops would have started from every border available and fought until they all met up. This would have been the only way to have defeated and prevented the Islamists from performing the way the are now. Belligerent as it may sound, that is the only way to defeat these people. They do not conform to any "gentleman's agreement on warfare." They apparently want victory greater than we do. We handcuff our soldiers and keep them from performing their primary function, win wars.

It is time to change strategy. Restart the war and win it. Kill the enemy. Give notice to the rest of the region that we will no longer put up with their Islamist fantasies. Live free or die. By this I mean, set aside your hatred and live in peace or we will kill you.

To all you moral relativists and multicultural advocate, go to the following links. After reading them I want to hear how you can justify their acts. You bunch of pathetic pimples.

Female Circumcission:
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/gwinnett/stories/2006/10/21/1022metAdem.html

Cultural relativism:
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=9001

Religious Tolerance:
http://www.compassdirect.org/en/display.php?page=lead&lang=en&length=long&idelement=4596&backpage=

Open Society:
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,1926567,00.html

Eden. From all accounts it was paradise. It was the closes thing to Heaven on earth. A home that God provided to man with everything man would need to survive and thrive. Man walked and talked with God and the angels. He ate the fruit of the land. Animals appear to be companions instead of food or predators. Can you imagine what this must have been like?

Since the fall, man has been in a race to turn this earth into Sheol. Rape, torture, murder, fraud, thievery, pedophilia, genocide, and any other kind of evil imaginable have found a home and a following on our planet. Man's pride, lust, and greed have led to the murder and oppression of untold billions. Man's history is a trail of tears with a blip, every now and then, for those few good men who end up falling victim to the existing evils of the time.

We face our own evils today. People throughout the world are killing and being killed for the same evils that appear to more than more than survived the centuries. In fact it appears to be gaining strength. Genocide on the African continent grows while "civilized" nations talk and do nothing. Islamists are murdering in the name of their allah while diplomats cower in corners. In this "modern world" we appear to be nothing more than a technologically advanced dark ages.

If you are thorough when you read the newspapers you will find a paragraph or two explaining a murderous raid that has occurred in numerous locations around the world. Rape is still a tool of these dark age "warriors". Beheadings, sodomy, and mass graves are the tools of these beasts. Villages and towns around the globe live in fear of the next attack. Can any westerner actually imagine what it is to live in this environment? While they scream for their apathetic diplomacy people are murdered. While the west teaches moral and cultural relativism, those other equal cultures are raping and murdering their way to power and control. Joe Westerner goes to work, enjoys his family, eats a good meal and sleeps in a soft bed while a village is being wiped off the planet.

I find myself getting spun up daily as I read these articles and then watch a "news story" about Madonna adopting a baby. How can this be? A Presidents whose biggest fault is Idealistic Compassion gets crucified for trying to make a positive difference while those who would allow the evil to continue to expand scream in selfish indignation that He is the murderous one. Yes, his strategy and tactics weren't what they should have been. What have you done?! He had an unrealistic approach to these human beings, assuming that they would welcome freedom and the fruits it bestows on the human soul. He failed to recognize that evil had already taken over these souls. His positive expectations were misplaced. Centuries of hatred cannot be quelled by mere niceness.

In my years on the planet their has been genocide in Vietnam, USSR, and at least twice in Africa. Child and Sex slavery has increased. Wars have been a constant. My time on this planet is a microcosm of the entirety of man's history. The difference now is technology. Despite this, their are men that still use the barbaric ways of the past to expand their dominion over others. Murdering a family creates terror while raping, sodomizing, and beheading with knifes creates true horror. Once again, can you imagine living in this kind of society?

The more I read of these situations the more I hate. When I read about a family being raped in front of each other or a child being murdered in front of the parents I feel a great swelling of anger and hatred. I want to kill these people. I wish I could be everywhere these people are and prevent them from performing there evil acts. I even find myself thinking of letting them live through the slow death that they put others through, one piece at a time. How can a human being do this to another human being? What is worse, the people who do this or those the let it happen? Or is it worse to be the one talking while this occurs? Or worse yet, wanting a diplomatic situation for mass murder?

As I have learned, people can justify any act they perform. A rapist , pedophile, or murderer always has an excuse. The Genocidal tyrant justifies his actions by -ism's. The genocidal soldier claims following orders. The diplomat claims talking solves everything. The westerner hides apathy by giving money and then being self righteous and indignant when it doesn't have the affect they knew it wouldn't. Others claim its purely a waste of time to help these barbarians. Apathy and cowardice lead to the greatest atrocities mankind can experience. Relativists make it impossible to even identify an evil.

Situations all around the globe are beyond diplomacy. We live in a world where talk is truly cheap. Action is what will make a difference. Kill the bad guys before they kill more good guys. Talk will not stop genocide. Talk will not prevent a Caliphate from being formed. Talk will not prevent a little girl from being raped or a father being murdered. Talk provides an umbrella for these evil men to continue their wicked practices.

If your god claims that it is honorable to murder your daughter because her rape is a blot on your family, your god is Lucifer. If your god declares that it is acceptable to rape a child, your god is Satan. If your god says diplomacy is honorable while thousands or millions are being slaughtered, your god is the most vile devil. Its that simple. Those who perform these acts as well as their enablers and the apathetic are guilty of the most heinous sin known to man.

This is what we have done with the world and freedom we were given. We rebeled and now we face the consequences. The only answer I see is more death. In order to prevent the killing, the killer must be killed. This is the sense that mankind has wrought. I am not one that believes we evolved from a fish or a monkey. None of those animals kill for sport or pleasure. If it were true we descended from these beasts then I would have to say we DEVOLVED. We had Heaven on earth and we blew it.

Islam is making its way into all aspects of everyday life on every continent. Media outlets are afraid to say anything other than the politically correct diatribe they have been citing since 9/11. Governments are going after Christian preachers and churches who say anything that may be "hurtful" towards anybody while the Muslims get a pass. A Christian stating that homosexual behavior is wrong is condemned as a bigot but a Muslim saying the same thing gets freedom of speech protection. An Israeli soldier kills a terrorist and he gets hung in the public square while an Islamists kidnaps and/or beheads an innocent and he's just fighting occupation.

This is the world we have made. Right is wrong and wrong is excused. Principles and ethics are relative unless your a multiculturalist then everything is relative and nothing is wrong except truth. If that doesn't make sense, you get the gyst of multiculturalism. Islamists can wear their burkas, hijabs, say their prayers in public schools, and preach hatred from their pulpits in Madrassas and Mosques but make sure you don't let those uppity Christians say the Pleadge of Allegiance. Christians try to proselytize and get persecuted. Islamists don't waste time with talk they offer violence or submission. Who would you rather have to dinner?

We are beyond mere cultural or civilizational suicide. We non-muslims are turning out to be the cowardly apathetic appeasers the Islamists declare we are. People all around the world are being slaughtered in the name of allah and its the United States that's the problem. Genocide in Darfur, America caused this by going into Iraq. Indonesia being overrun by Islamists, America caused this by supporting Israel. Iran obtaining a potential nuclear weapon, America caused this by refusing to recognize their "legitimate" government. North Korea conducting nuclear tests and the US is blamed for not being willing to deal with the fruit loop in charge of the DPRK. Political leaders have jumped to the forfront of their countries and parties by standing on the anti-American platform.

I have major issues with my President's strategy in the Iraq war. However, at least he did something no matter how misguided. We could no longer keep living as if there was nothing wrong with the Islamic third world. How can a free democratic republic live with themselves when they make deals with oppressive torturous despots? How can a freeman sleep at night when he knows that people are still being sold into slavery and tortured? How can a freeman send his child off to school and not think about the millions of children who are taught to kill instead of basic arithematic and reading? How can a man kiss his wife before he goes to work and not think of the man who was taken from his family in the middle of the night never to be seen or heard of again? This is the world that Islamists live in and wish to expand.

As I have stated numerous times, we are in a religious war. G-d versus allah, heaven versus hades, tolerance versus hatred, and freedom versus slavery. What are you willing to die for? It appears the Islamists are neither apathetic nor appeasers. They will kill and die for what they want. Is your freedom worth your life? Is your family's freedom worth your life? Is the freedom of your fellow man worth your efforts and your life? If you answered no to any of these, you don't deserve the freedom you are presently enjoying.

Genesis 3

4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
                                                           - KJV

Ye shall be as gods. This is the origin of all mans problems. Every -ism man has founded since then can find its initiative in this verse in the Bible. Man has had a twofold battle: Man's relationship to God, Man's desire to be God. Communism, Socialism, Fascism, Humanism, and many other -ism's, at the very least, attempt to negate the importance of an omniscient being. In the case of Communism and Humanism, they deny this being's very existence. Man is his own god. If there is no God, there is no soul, there is no afterlife, and there is no reason for personal sacrifice or personal gain.

The problem with this way of thinking is that it is inherent to human beings that something take its place. It could be the individual, which conflicts with many -ism's, or it could be a "higher powered" state. Something within the human animal makes it impossible to deny that there is something higher than itself that must be respected and served. This in itself conflicts with the desire to be one's own god. To see man as god is to deny a natural inherent feeling of purpose. If mankind and this world is an accident there is no purpose to any of it. This creates consternation for the reason I already mentioned. A man who tries to prove himself a god spends his life going in circles. The proof he seeks is never found. At the end, he has wasted the gift and opportunity of life for nothing. Not a good thing to realize on a deathbed. Unfortunately, he has affected others who will find out the same way.

Handing the godhead title to the state solves the "higher powered" problem. This is something outside of the individual that he can "see" and be part of. Instead of claiming one's self as a god, let someone else fill that role. Subservience is easier when the master is not one's self. It also takes away decision making and any sense of responsibility. The problem here lies with the fact that it is still a human that is acting in the god role. The fallibility of human nature creates confusion and chaos and will eventually lead to megalomania which, as we have seen, is destructive. In the previous century we have seen what can happen when man takes on the role of god: Tojo, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Minh, Mao, Amin, and other smaller level "gods" are prime examples of man's capabilities when given this authority. Man's desire, pride, greed, and lust lead to despotism and murder.

The incontinence of man makes it impossible to create a society of peace without the hammer of death. Because there is no soul or afterlife, peace on earth must be maintained through force. Even among the humanists there are differences in opinion about who is right. The answer, the strongest. If you speak out, you're killed. If you protest, you are killed. If you dare revolt, you and your followers are killed. This answer makes perfect sense if there is no omniscient God. Life is of little or no purpose if we are all one big accident. Despite popular opinion, more people have been murdered in the fight to eliminate the need of an omnipotent God than murdered in the name of God. The previous century took care of that.

The serpent is still among us. It is still trying to convince us that we are more than we actually are. It justifies all of our actions as well as our reactions and inactions. It claims bad is good and good is bad. It fills in our doubts and questions with humanity. Logic nor reason play in the serpents realm. A man's pride leads him to this destruction. Misguided self-importance suppresses his soul and inherent knowledge. Meanwhile the serpent smiles.

 
Socialism:Function: noun
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

Communism: Function: noun
Etymology: French communisme, from commun common
1 a : a theory advocating elimination of private property b : a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed
2 capitalized a : a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics b : a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production c : a final stage of society in Marxist theory in which the state has withered away and economic goods are distributed equitably d : communist systems collectively

Which of these -ism's do you prefer? I ask this because we are heading in this direction. Despite the proven failures and inherent evils in both, our society is going down the path towards these -ism's. Stagnation, both economically and technologically, are the gifts of these
-ism's. Both the Democrat and the Republican parties see a way for the government to "help" people. The democrats more so, but the republicans are making headway in this realm. If you want to see the results of these -ism's look to the USSR, China, Europe, and Canada. The only thing saving CHina right now is the 2 billion people. At some point in the not so distant future, even China will have a hard time taking care of its elderly, disabled, and retired populace. That is of course, unless it is required to work until you die.

Socialism and Communism are cradle to grave ideologies that require the sacrifice of individuality. As the definitions state there is no private property, no individual, and the government runs all. To continue on our present course is to eradicate the Bill of Rights and declare that all men are not granted inalienable rights by their creator. A man will no longer be judged on his character or merit. In fact, a man won't be judged at all. He can be as lazy and wicked as he wants to be and that's ok, Uncle Sam will take care of him anyway. Uncle Sam being You and Me.

These -ism's are both economic and political. Sounds like Islamism. You can't be a socialist or communist and praise individuality. Great achievements are not attained through individual strength and hard work. Great achievements can only be attained through communal action. Go with the Mob. As I mentioned earlier both of these -ism's are proven failures. Only deceit and manipulation can allow these -ism's to last for any length of time. Europe is in it's death throes with socialism, and we saw what happened to the USSR and communism. China is trying to slowly enter into the capitalist arena. Until it recognizes the importance of Individualism and the contributions made by this, they will never achieve the heights they could.

Capitalism:Function: noun
: an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.

Capitalism is an economic -ism. It may affect one's politics but does not control it. Capitalism takes the hard work of one and provides an opportunity for others. It uses the ambition and greed of one and makes it beneficial for others. For a man to become wealthy he must produce something. In order to produce, he must pay people to work. This basic premise provides runs the American economy. This basic premise is also makes it possible for people to feed and clothe their families. The individual with an idea and a work ethic can be rewarded in a capitalist economy.

In capitalism the Bill of Rights is vital. The individual is important. Without the individual you have no community. If there is no reward for hard work and imagination, why should a person try. This is Socialism and Communism's inherent problem. How do you motivate without rewarding? Negative reinforcement, over time, leads to negative reactions.

When a society has reached Socialism it has failed. When it reaches Communism all hope is lost, ask the Russians.

I just changed to this two column format. When I get to 2000 hits I'll change to something else.

Claiming that all cultures and ideas are of equal value is a form of cowardice. It negates the need to thoroughly research and evaluate a point of view. This could be construed as pure laziness. The problem here is that it allows individuals and societies to ignore any threats to their own existence. The biggest battle that human beings fight on a daily basis is the one against slavery. For relativism to grow, ignorance must grow with it. Relativism is not self-sustaining. Ignorance, hatred, apathy, confusion, and laziness are major contributing factors to the growth of relativism. They are also factors in cowardice. When I use the word ignorance I am not referring to people who don't have access or the ability to research for themselves. I am applying this to people who intentionally ignore facts and events as they occur. The latter four factors build and protect this ignorance.

All five factors are walls that encircle an individual or society to "protect" it from the big dangerous world. Unfortunately for these people these walls are not stable nor protective. At some point truth and reality will collapse these walls onto the individual or society causing greater damage than facing the truth ever could. Meanwhile, hiding within these walls allows a person to support whatever asinine ideology comes down the pipe from multiculturalism to communism. These people and societies are willing to give up whatever liberties and freedoms they have in order to "just get along." These groups will blame themselves before they blame the people who want them dead. I am a big advocate for personal responsibility. This not only involves discipline and control of ones own actions, it also involves using the brain to evaluate and properly respond to certain situations. If a burglar breaks into your house and takes your stereo, whose fault is it? The relativist will blame the homeowner. "he shouldn't have bought that house", or "he shouldn't have bought that specific stereo system." These excuses may sound asinine and to the extreme but I have actually heard them used for just this kind of crime. A person actually blamed themselves for another human being breaking into their locked house and stealing. Pathetic.

Believing that all thing are equal takes away the value of a truly good idea. Believing that all things are equal takes away the uniqueness of each individual. Relativism would have you believe that the crack dealer is equal to Bill Gates. Relativism would have you believe that Sharia Law is equal to Constitutional Law. Relativism would have you believe that an Ayatollah is equal to an elected President. These same people would have not fought against a monarchy in the 18th century nor slavery in the 19th century. According to relativism, all ways of life are equal. Better an ignorant slave than dead fighting for freedom.

Relativism provides excuses and justifications for murder, rape, and torture. It provides excuses for genocide and terrorism. It provides inroads for murderous and inhumane cultural practices while blaming those who wish to stop this progression. A relativist will blame the hot stove instead of the child who touches it. The biggest psychological value that relativism has is the covering up of cowardice. If you're a relativist you never have to fight. You can justify not fighting by throwing equivalency everywhere. No one need know that you are a coward because you have other cowards defending you with their words. The sad part of this whole thing is not only do the cowards know hey are, the people they are trying to convince know their cowards anyway. Putting on cologne doesn't change the fact your dirty. In fact it accentuates your filth and makes it worse.

Relativism will destroy both an individual and society, mainly because it is fueled by cowardice. Europe is presently reaping the relativism it has sowed. Is America next?

When will we be hit again? Where will it take place? What kind of attack will it be? Who will be behind it? These are all legitimate questions. There is nothing our government can do to prevent a maniacal idealogue from carrying out an attack if he is determined to do so. It can be a suicide bomber in a restaurant or a loner dumping chemical toxins into a water supply. It can be a dirty bomb or a small nuclear device. It can be on the scale of Columbine or Iwo Jima. Nobody knows.

Meanwhile "Civil Liberty" peons are shuttling around the country doing their best to scuttle the laws and actions of a government that is trying its best to protect us while still observing our constitutionally granted liberties. These "civil liberties" lawyers and their ilk are taking us down a European path. Islamists threaten riots if they are offended so it must be the Christians fault. Don't dare pray in school unless you are a muslim. All around the globe governments and societies are surrendering to the Islamic advance. Dhimmitude is preferred to death. Despite the proof that the Islamists can't be appeased the Europeans and the Leftists are giving it their best efforts. All the while people are being blown up, kidnapped, and murdered.

Christians are accused of trying to lead the United States to a theocratic country. Meanwhile Islam, with it's "honor Killings", clitoridectomies, dhimmitude and jizya, fatwas, and "honorable" clerics are allowed to say and do anything they want. Lawyers are now taking a case to defend muslims who provide money to jihadists because it is their religious duty to do so. To what level of asininity must we reach before enough is enough. We are helping the enemy in our own destruction. The communist, socialist, anarchist groups within the US are siding with the Islamic enemy. Universal health care is pretty much a mute point if there isn't anyone to take care of. Minimum wage laws mean nothing when there are no jobs to go to. Gay marriage goes out the door if gays are killed according to sharia law.

The war has come home whether we want to admit it or not. Treason is rampant yet it is intentionally ignored or misnamed. Americans are fighting Americans while the Islamists place themselves on the moral high ground. They kill innocents and its forgiven. We kill terrorists and its an assault on allah. Years of ignorance and selfish attitudes are leading to our dismantling. The "make peace not war" crowd became the "me" decade and is now the "what happened" generation. Personal responsibility has been replaced by "it takes a village." A person is not a victim unless they wear a hijab or pray towards mecca. Our nation has become the victim of this lunacy.

As a nation we have reached our adolescence. Just like an average teenager we are full of ourselves and consider ourselves immortal. As many teenagers discover every year, life can end abruptly and unceremoniously. Death through greed and multiculturalism. Not every culture is equal. I believe whole-heartedly that we have the greatest culture on the planet, despite our flaws. Unfortunately many of my fellow Americans don't feel the same. I would recommend that they move to the culture they feel is superior and lets us remaining Americans deal with our own. With us or against us. It's that simple.

It's only a matter of time before we are attacked again. The question remains, how will we respond? I see a major schism becoming an abyss.

 Steven Emerson, Director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism, discusses the situation involving a French Philosophy teacher that has to go in hiding because of an insult against Islam.

Right click on the link and download.



http://www.investigativeproject.org/SAE-FXNWS-10-14-06.wmv