Posted by
James Biga on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:58:36 PM
And he said memos detailing gruesome torture under George Bush reflect the U.S. 'losing our moral bearings'.
Just what moral bearings is he referring to? Is it better to treat the enemy "humanely" and allow other Americans or friends be killed? How would this be moral? The enemy is constantly ready to go one step further than the West is in regards to obtaining what it wants. It will kill the infidel and itself to obtain a world under allahs rule. The enemy will kill men, women, children, cripples, iold people, and anyone else that it deems in the way of obtaining it's stated goal.
To those who have been soothed by nicer words such as "overseas contingency operations" and "man made disasters", this shows that the enemy is correct in its assumptions. The West is weak. There is only so far it will go to defend its G-d given freedom. They would rather live in fear and as slaves than fight for what is rightfully their's.
All of you out there who claim that being threatened with drowning, being kept in a cell mnaked, or being deprived of sleep is too harsh, how would you have liked to awoken to another major terror attack
conducted in LA? How many of your fellow Americans should be forced to lose family members because we have to be "nicer"? How far would you go to defend your own? If the answer isn't "as far as it takes" then I pray that you never have to be forced to defend your family.